AWS Consulting for the
Systems Revenue Runs On

An AWS consultant turns cloud intent into a running, governed estate: architecture decisions matched to your workloads, migrations staged and rehearsed, CI/CD and infrastructure as code so environments are reproducible, IAM and security controls done properly, and a cost model someone actually owns. The differences between firms are who does the work and what it connects to - at Cloudsheer every engagement is led by a senior architect, quoted as a fixed price against a written scope, and designed around the CRM and AI systems the business runs on, not just the infrastructure underneath them.

Not yet, and we will not pretend otherwise: our AWS Partnership Track is in progress. The work is delivered today by certified senior engineers, and the credentials you can verify right now are real - a verified Salesforce Consulting Partner listing on AppExchange, Microsoft AI Cloud Partner, and Anthropic Claude Partner. When the AWS badge lands it will appear here; until then, judge us on delivered work and the partnerships that already check out.

Every engagement is quoted as a fixed price against a written scope, and the number is produced after a free scoping call - a migration of three workloads is a different project from a landing zone plus a FinOps program, so we do not publish price lists. What we commit to: the scoping call ends with a real number, not a range that doubles later, and there is no hourly meter running once the scope is signed.

It is a structured audit of your AWS estate against the six pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework: operational excellence, security, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization, and sustainability. You need one if the estate grew organically, if an audit or SOC 2 effort is coming, or if the bill keeps climbing and nobody can say why. Ours ends in a written findings report ranked by risk and effort - a plan you can execute with us or without us.

It depends on what is moving and how it is moving: a lift-and-shift of a few contained workloads is measured in weeks, while re-platforming or modernizing application by application runs months, staged so something is live and validated early. The honest answer arrives with the scope - we map the workloads first, pick lift-and-shift, re-platform, or modernize per workload, and put the timeline in writing alongside the fixed price.

FinOps is one of our core AWS service areas, and we published the playbook: the five cost optimization wins we ship for mid-market teams in the first 90 days - right-sizing, Savings Plans coverage, storage tiering, and the rest - are on the blog for you to read before you ever talk to us. We will not quote a savings percentage for an estate we have not seen; the scoping call is where the real number comes from.

Yes - and this is the part of the practice we can prove today. Cloudsheer is an Anthropic Claude Partner, and we deploy Claude through Amazon Bedrock inside Salesforce Agentforce for clients in regulated industries, where keeping the model inside the AWS boundary matters. Bedrock and SageMaker builds are scoped like everything else: fixed price, written scope, senior engineers.

No. We build, migrate, secure, and optimize - and we hand over infrastructure as code, documentation, and training so your team owns what we built. Where clients want ongoing help, a named team can keep owning the patch cadence, cost reviews, and the optimization backlog, but that is working alongside your IT team, not instead of it.

Yes - it is a signature of the practice rather than an afterthought. We run a dedicated AWS-Salesforce integration offering, starting with S3 file storage wired into Salesforce, and we deploy Claude via Bedrock inside Agentforce. Because Cloudsheer is a verified Salesforce Consulting Partner as well as a cloud engineering shop, the same firm owns both sides of that join.

You keep everything: infrastructure as code in your repos, runbooks, and a trained team. Most clients also continue with us on an optimization backlog - cost reviews, Well-Architected re-checks, and the next tranche of workloads - under the same model as the build: a named senior team and a written scope for each phase.